Chain of title
Does the prospective supplier have authority to license the relevant content and any embedded third-party materials?
Access is only the beginning. We treat source authority, permitted uses, privacy, and contractual clarity as essential parts of a viable AI dataset.
Data owners may possess valuable operational records without holding every right necessary to license them for AI training or evaluation. We design sourcing conversations to surface those distinctions early.
Who provided the material and on what asserted authority?
When, how, and for what purposes was it created or gathered?
Which training, testing, sublicensing, and retention rights were negotiated?
What normalization, filtering, and privacy-related steps were performed?
These considerations inform a sourcing checklist; contractual and privacy determinations require appropriate legal review.
Does the prospective supplier have authority to license the relevant content and any embedded third-party materials?
Are there identifiable individuals, sensitive fields, or consent and notice obligations?
Do the proposed terms explicitly encompass the actual buyer use, including any training or evaluation requirements?
Are there customer agreements, trade secrets, or commercial restrictions affecting transfer?
Can the dataset’s source, transformations, and subsets be explained at the level required by the buyer?
Can the buyer validate delivered format, use rights, exclusions, and accompanying metadata?
“We can access this data” is not the same as “we can legally license this data for your intended AI use.” We do not treat third-party or sensitive content as resale-ready without the required approvals and controls.
Describe your intended use and commercial constraints; we’ll scope the necessary source and licensing questions.